In a recent facebook debate, Chuck Cannon asked the question, “Does God Have free will?” This sparked an ongoing debate which quickly turned to the question, “Does God exist?”, etc.
Then the question of faith vs. reason. I always think its strange that the two are sometimes presented as polar opposites.
Here is part of Chuck’s response that seem applicable to songwriting:
Chuck Cannon commented on his status:
I am a songwriter.
I have no idea what I am going to write next. I can be in the middle of a song and have no idea what the next line is going to be. I have no way of "knowing" if the lines I write are the right ones.
But I have "faith" that I can write songs. That faith has been supported by "reason" ... I have actually made money writing songs and have had people (besides friends and family) tell me my songs are good.
But the only way I will ever write another one is to have faith that I can ...
If I just sit on my ass and have "faith" nothing will happen. (Yes, I have empirical evidence!) So I spend an enormous amount of time reading ... looking for ideas. I write off movie tickets because I find so many ideas there ... I listen to people and how they say things ... what they love ... who they love ... what they believe ...
But once I'm in the middle of a song, "reason" plays a huge role ... I analyze ... I use dictionaries, a thesaurus, quotation books ... my old harmony textbooks for musical ideas ... different instruments ... different co-writers ...
poets and mathematicians ...
they are both at work in my brain ...
so faith and reason feed on each other in my world all the time ... i bet in your world too ...
and tomorrow I can get up and crank my tractor and move some gravel around on my driveway or I can stay right here in my studio and see if a song shows up ...
fate has brought me to this moment of choice ...
and my choices have brought me to this fate ...
Peace ~ Chuck"
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Performance Royalties for Performers on Radio
The proposed measure in the Senate calls for a performance royalty to be paid to the artists for airplay.
Whether you know it or not, artists are currently not compensated for terrestrial radio airplay of their music. Writers and publishers are compensated, but the owners of the recordings are not.
To my knowledge, the royalty is 1/2 cent per play, to be added to the current royalty to then be distributed to the artists.
The NAB response is that local radio stations can not afford such an increase, and would have to suspend local news coverage, weather and all kinds of other services just to pay these (inferred greedy) artists for the use of their music. They even created the phrase PERFORMANCE TAX to gather public opinion against it.
Well, lets do some math.
If a radio station plays 15 songs an hour (I challenge you to find one that plays that many), 168 hours a week, 4.3 weeks a month.. or 10,836 songs a month.
10,836 songs a month! That’s a lot of songs.. That sounds like a lot of money, right?
At 1/2 cent each... the bill comes to $54.18 a month.
If an artist’s music helps to generate an audience... which sells advertising... which pays the bills, don’t you think that artist should get a penny every couple times his song gets played?
If there’s a better and cheaper way for a station to generate listeners, I say they should go for it. Music sounds like a bargain, to me.
Seriously. How much bad news do we have to give up for 55 bucks a month?
Whether you know it or not, artists are currently not compensated for terrestrial radio airplay of their music. Writers and publishers are compensated, but the owners of the recordings are not.
To my knowledge, the royalty is 1/2 cent per play, to be added to the current royalty to then be distributed to the artists.
The NAB response is that local radio stations can not afford such an increase, and would have to suspend local news coverage, weather and all kinds of other services just to pay these (inferred greedy) artists for the use of their music. They even created the phrase PERFORMANCE TAX to gather public opinion against it.
Well, lets do some math.
If a radio station plays 15 songs an hour (I challenge you to find one that plays that many), 168 hours a week, 4.3 weeks a month.. or 10,836 songs a month.
10,836 songs a month! That’s a lot of songs.. That sounds like a lot of money, right?
At 1/2 cent each... the bill comes to $54.18 a month.
If an artist’s music helps to generate an audience... which sells advertising... which pays the bills, don’t you think that artist should get a penny every couple times his song gets played?
If there’s a better and cheaper way for a station to generate listeners, I say they should go for it. Music sounds like a bargain, to me.
Seriously. How much bad news do we have to give up for 55 bucks a month?
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Took It For Granted
I’ve been waking up multiple times during the night. (and its not because I drank too much water before bed)
I’ve been waking up with lines and couplets. Ideas and rhymes. A few nights ago I woke up and thought, that’s a great idea. I’ll remember that. I didn’t even need to get up and write it down, it was that good. Good thing, because I was at a hotel and I didn’t have my notepad next to me..
I forgot the idea by the time I woke up again.
Try as I might, I’m still lamenting the loss of that idea. Moleskin is back in place. Recorder is at the ready. Its been awhile since the thoughts bubbled. Now they boil at times.
I’m thankful they’re back and I will try to be prepared. Hit me, Lord. Hit me!
I’ve been waking up with lines and couplets. Ideas and rhymes. A few nights ago I woke up and thought, that’s a great idea. I’ll remember that. I didn’t even need to get up and write it down, it was that good. Good thing, because I was at a hotel and I didn’t have my notepad next to me..
I forgot the idea by the time I woke up again.
Try as I might, I’m still lamenting the loss of that idea. Moleskin is back in place. Recorder is at the ready. Its been awhile since the thoughts bubbled. Now they boil at times.
I’m thankful they’re back and I will try to be prepared. Hit me, Lord. Hit me!
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
WANTED. Up-tempo Radio-Ready Drivel.
I was reading a posting over at Ninety Mile Wind on the current state of the country music market that prompted the following response:
The current parade of country drivel on terrestrial radio is perceived to be what the customer wants, and in some respects, it IS what the customer wants, or at least what they are willing to settle-for to get where they want to be. They play it, and people listen. (or at least advertisers think so)
Artists and writers can't stand most of it, of course, but the market exists, and it comes with formulaic risk that is easily exploited by the accountants and execs.
Pop culture will always exist, and it will rarely be pretty, and will almost always be laughable and/or forgotten in hindsight, but as long as people will put up with them, 30 second hits are not going away.
There will always be someone willing to whip up what the customer will consume.
I'm reminded of a quote from Henry Ford. When asked about giving the customers what they want, he replied, "If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said 'Faster Horses'.
People and labels may think they want more drivel (uptempo horses), but what people really want is a way to extract themselves from reality and for that, the current drivel and vacuum-packed productions deliver! Even we, as artists, have to admit we’re distracted from reality as we contemplate how such a mindless song ever made it to the airwaves.
Unless presented with a different destination and a compelling vehicle to get them there, the consumer will continue to shovel all the hay and manure the label’s hit-farms have to offer.
Songwriters. You were made for a higher purpose.
©2009 Tim Wheeler
Friday, August 7, 2009
A friend of mine sent me a link to unique perspective on Artists vs. Broadcaster debate over the Performance Rights Act.
Cathy Hughes Attacks John Conyers for His Support of Performance Rights Act

Another valuable perspective. Check out who else she’s attacking.
It occurs to me that it is an outright battle just to find the other side of this story. The general public only hears about the PERFORMANCE “TAX” fight, which in itself is a blatant misrepresentation. (The Government will not be involved in the payment system for the peformer’s royalties... no tax collected) The reason is that the media outlets that can spread the news are biased on the issue.
The only reason I even questioned the first news I heard on this was because of a funny feeling in my gut. I had to do some serious digging to get another perspective.
Always Follow the money.
Cathy Hughes Attacks John Conyers for His Support of Performance Rights Act
Another valuable perspective. Check out who else she’s attacking.
It occurs to me that it is an outright battle just to find the other side of this story. The general public only hears about the PERFORMANCE “TAX” fight, which in itself is a blatant misrepresentation. (The Government will not be involved in the payment system for the peformer’s royalties... no tax collected) The reason is that the media outlets that can spread the news are biased on the issue.
The only reason I even questioned the first news I heard on this was because of a funny feeling in my gut. I had to do some serious digging to get another perspective.
Always Follow the money.
Friday, June 26, 2009
The King Is Dead.
Michael Jackson was an Icon with a capital ‘i’. He took his work seriously and never produced a sub-par piece of work. Whether you like his style, or not, you cannot deny his consistent level of excellence. I remember waiting to watch a new video or listen to a new song when he would be working. My expectation was that it was always top shelf. I don’t remember being disappointed.
His personal life, of course, was a freak-show. There was a sweet innocence about his demeanor. Personally, I prefer not to think he was perverted, that he was trying to go back to another time when everyone wasn’t suspect. I may be wrong, but I prefer not to have to rectify that type of perversion with the art and message that his art portrayed. Some know the truth, but in this day and age you don’t know who’s telling the truth.
It was obvious he was trying to fill a bottomless hole. His plastic surgery, skin color, Neverland. Deep down, I think he was longing for acceptance. Perhaps, from his father. Perhaps from his fans. Perhaps from the press. Perhaps from himself.
Surely he got glimpses of it when each of his projects were released... Thriller had no critics... but I sense it was never enough.
I cranked up BLACK OR WHITE last night. I love that song.. mostly I love the performance. There is so much energy in that performance and so many other MJ creations.
I never idolized Michael Jackson, but I bought his stuff. It was always worth the money. I did my part to contribute to his acceptance, but I’m only human, and in the end, its not the acceptance of other humans that ultimately fulfills.
“If you’re wantin’ to be my brother it don’t matter if you’re black or white.”
Monday, June 8, 2009
Performance "Tax" on Broadcast Radio. VOTE YES! Here's why...
There’s a fire storm raging about the new performance “tax” that is being presented to Congress.
Now, I’m the first to bristle at new taxes, but I got a bad feeling in my stomach when it was the radio stations and NAB pushing to stop it in its tracks. Keep in mind that it was the broadcasters who formed BMI to limit performance royalties paid out to composers and songwriters... (competing with ASCAP) I kept hearing things like greedy record labels.. so I looked into it.
First off, the word TAX... the broadcasters came up with that.. there is no mention of the word in the bill.
Seems that performers are not paid performance royalties in the US. Writers and publishers are, and have been since 1909 or some such year.. but for 80 years, performers are not and have not been paid. The excuse the broadcasters have used for years is the music business is paid via sales as a result of radio air play. Of course, with the advent of illegal downloads, most of that revenue is gone. Additionally, as the major labels dominance continues to wane, smaller labels get more airplay, but continue to get no compensation.
NAB is arguing that it will cause less music to be played on the radio. Like there’s a lot now? Demand will dictate how much music is played on the radio, and having to pay another 1/2 cent royalty to the performer is not going to eliminate profit for the broadcasters.
Music is the reason people listen. Artists should be compensated for their work.
Furthermore, as most are unaware, there are millions collected world wide for US artists on foreign stations, but because the US does not pay, those royalties are not distributed to US artists. That would open those funds up for artists as well.
Get on your horn. Let your congressman know that we want artists to be paid, just like publishers and writers are paid.
Remember, the Big labels.. well when their gone, its just us small labels and musicians left.. and how are we going to change the laws, then?
So, unless you’re not for artist getting paid for performing their works, you should be FOR this bill, not against it.
The House Bill in question is H.R. 848. Check into it, and spread the word. Call your Representative.
Now, I’m the first to bristle at new taxes, but I got a bad feeling in my stomach when it was the radio stations and NAB pushing to stop it in its tracks. Keep in mind that it was the broadcasters who formed BMI to limit performance royalties paid out to composers and songwriters... (competing with ASCAP) I kept hearing things like greedy record labels.. so I looked into it.
First off, the word TAX... the broadcasters came up with that.. there is no mention of the word in the bill.
Seems that performers are not paid performance royalties in the US. Writers and publishers are, and have been since 1909 or some such year.. but for 80 years, performers are not and have not been paid. The excuse the broadcasters have used for years is the music business is paid via sales as a result of radio air play. Of course, with the advent of illegal downloads, most of that revenue is gone. Additionally, as the major labels dominance continues to wane, smaller labels get more airplay, but continue to get no compensation.
NAB is arguing that it will cause less music to be played on the radio. Like there’s a lot now? Demand will dictate how much music is played on the radio, and having to pay another 1/2 cent royalty to the performer is not going to eliminate profit for the broadcasters.
Music is the reason people listen. Artists should be compensated for their work.
Furthermore, as most are unaware, there are millions collected world wide for US artists on foreign stations, but because the US does not pay, those royalties are not distributed to US artists. That would open those funds up for artists as well.
Get on your horn. Let your congressman know that we want artists to be paid, just like publishers and writers are paid.
Remember, the Big labels.. well when their gone, its just us small labels and musicians left.. and how are we going to change the laws, then?
So, unless you’re not for artist getting paid for performing their works, you should be FOR this bill, not against it.
The House Bill in question is H.R. 848. Check into it, and spread the word. Call your Representative.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)