Monday, June 8, 2009

Performance "Tax" on Broadcast Radio. VOTE YES! Here's why...

There’s a fire storm raging about the new performance “tax” that is being presented to Congress.

Now, I’m the first to bristle at new taxes, but I got a bad feeling in my stomach when it was the radio stations and NAB pushing to stop it in its tracks. Keep in mind that it was the broadcasters who formed BMI to limit performance royalties paid out to composers and songwriters... (competing with ASCAP) I kept hearing things like greedy record labels.. so I looked into it.

First off, the word TAX... the broadcasters came up with that.. there is no mention of the word in the bill.

Seems that performers are not paid performance royalties in the US. Writers and publishers are, and have been since 1909 or some such year.. but for 80 years, performers are not and have not been paid. The excuse the broadcasters have used for years is the music business is paid via sales as a result of radio air play. Of course, with the advent of illegal downloads, most of that revenue is gone. Additionally, as the major labels dominance continues to wane, smaller labels get more airplay, but continue to get no compensation.

NAB is arguing that it will cause less music to be played on the radio. Like there’s a lot now? Demand will dictate how much music is played on the radio, and having to pay another 1/2 cent royalty to the performer is not going to eliminate profit for the broadcasters.

Music is the reason people listen. Artists should be compensated for their work.

Furthermore, as most are unaware, there are millions collected world wide for US artists on foreign stations, but because the US does not pay, those royalties are not distributed to US artists. That would open those funds up for artists as well.

Get on your horn. Let your congressman know that we want artists to be paid, just like publishers and writers are paid.

Remember, the Big labels.. well when their gone, its just us small labels and musicians left.. and how are we going to change the laws, then?

So, unless you’re not for artist getting paid for performing their works, you should be FOR this bill, not against it.

The House Bill in question is H.R. 848. Check into it, and spread the word. Call your Representative.

No comments: